I read this comment here:
href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1270760/passing-a-string-by-reference-in-java">Passing
a String by Reference in
Java?
Yes, it's a misconception. It's a huge, widespread misconception. It
leads to an interview question I hate: ("how does Java pass
arguments"). I
hate it because roughly half of the interviewers
actually seem to want the
wrong answer ("primitives by value, objects
by reference"). The right answer
takes longer to give, and seems to
confuse some of them. And they won't be
convinced: I swear I flunked a
tech screen because the CSMajor-type screener
had heard the
misconception in college and believed it as gospel.
Feh. – CPerkins
Aug 13 '09 at
14:34
Can someone
please explain, in terms that a new programmer can grasp, what is the difference between
saying:
"In Java primitives are passed by value
and objects are passed by
reference."
and:
"In
Java nothing is passed by reference and references are passed by
value."?
Are both of these
statements true in some sense? I don't want to invite a rant parade, but
this sounds like a really important concept, and one I still do not completely
understand.
No comments:
Post a Comment