Sunday 22 October 2017

javascript - How does Access-Control-Allow-Origin header work?

style="font-weight: bold;">

Answer



style="font-weight: bold;">

Answer





Apparently, I have completely
misunderstood its semantics. I thought of something like
this:




  1. A client downloads
    javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the
    origin
    .

  2. The response header of MyCode.js
    contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I
    thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site
    B.

  3. The client triggers some functionality of MyCode.js,
    which in turn make requests to http://siteB, which should be fine, despite being
    cross-origin
    requests.




Well,
I am wrong. It does not work like this at all. So, I have read href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-origin_resource_sharing">Cross-origin
resource sharing and attempted to read href="http://www.w3.org/TR/cors/.">Cross-Origin Resource Sharing in w3c
recommendation



One thing is sure - I
still do not understand how am I supposed to use this header.



I have full control of both site A and site B.
How do I enable the javascript code downloaded from the site A to access resources on
the site B using this
header?



P.S.



I
do not want to utilize JSONP.



class="post-text" itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer




Access-Control-Allow-Origin
is a CORS
(Cross-Origin Resource Sharing)
header
.



When Site A tries to fetch
content from Site B, Site B can send an
Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to tell the browser
that the content of this page is accessible to certain origins. (An
origin is a href="https://stackoverflow.com/a/19542686/710446">domain, plus a scheme and port
number.) By default, Site B's pages are href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-origin_policy" rel="noreferrer">not
accessible to any other origin; using the
Access-Control-Allow-Origin header opens a door for
cross-origin access by specific requesting
origins.



For each resource/page that Site B
wants to make accessible to Site A, Site B should serve its pages with the response
header:



Access-Control-Allow-Origin:
http://siteA.com



Modern
browsers will not block cross-domain requests outright. If Site A requests a page from
Site B, the browser will actually fetch the requested page on the network
level
and check if the response headers list Site A as a permitted requester
domain. If Site B has not indicated that Site A is allowed to access this page, the
browser will trigger the XMLHttpRequest's
error event and deny the response data to the requesting
JavaScript code.





What
happens on the network level can be slightly more complex than
explained above. If the request is a href="http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/cors/#toc-handling-a-not-so-simple-request"
rel="noreferrer">"non-simple" request, the browser first sends a data-less
"preflight" OPTIONS request, to verify that the server will accept the request. A
request is non-simple when either (or
both):




  • using an HTTP verb
    other than GET or POST (e.g. PUT, DELETE)

  • using
    non-simple request headers; the only simple requests headers
    are:



    • Accept

    • Accept-Language

    • Content-Language

    • Content-Type
      (this is only simple when its value is
      application/x-www-form-urlencoded,
      multipart/form-data, or
      text/plain)




If
the server responds to the OPTIONS preflight with appropriate response headers
(Access-Control-Allow-Headers for non-simple headers,
Access-Control-Allow-Methods for non-simple verbs) that match
the non-simple verb and/or non-simple headers, then the browser sends the actual
request.




Supposing that Site A wants
to send a PUT request for /somePage, with a non-simple
Content-Type value of
application/json, the browser would first send a preflight
request:



OPTIONS /somePage
HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Request-Method:
PUT
Access-Control-Request-Headers:
Content-Type


Note that
Access-Control-Request-Method and
Access-Control-Request-Headers are added by the browser
automatically; you do not need to add them. This OPTIONS preflight gets the successful
response
headers:




Access-Control-Allow-Origin:
http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST,
PUT
Access-Control-Allow-Headers:
Content-Type


When
sending the actual request (after preflight is done), the behavior is identical to how a
simple request is handled. In other words, a non-simple request whose preflight is
successful is treated the same as a simple request (i.e., the server must still send
Access-Control-Allow-Origin again for the actual
response).



The browsers sends the actual
request:



PUT /somePage
HTTP/1.1

Origin: http://siteA.com
Content-Type:
application/json

{ "myRequestContent": "JSON is so great"
}


And the server sends
back an Access-Control-Allow-Origin, just as it would for a
simple
request:



Access-Control-Allow-Origin:
http://siteA.com



See
Understanding XMLHttpRequest
over CORS
for a little more information about non-simple
requests.


No comments:

Post a Comment

php - file_get_contents shows unexpected output while reading a file

I want to output an inline jpg image as a base64 encoded string, however when I do this : $contents = file_get_contents($filename); print &q...