xor eax, eax will always set
eax to zero, right? So, why does MSVC++ sometimes put it in my
executable's code? Is it more efficient that mov eax,?
0
012B1002 in al,dx
012B1003 push ecx
int i = 5;
012B1004 mov dword ptr
[i],5
return 0;
012B100B xor eax,eax
Also, what
does it mean to do in al, dx?
Answer
Yes, it is more
efficient.
The opcode is shorter than
mov eax, 0, only 2 bytes, and the processor recognizes the
special case and treats it as a mov eax, 0 without a false read
dependency on eax, so the execution time is the
same.
No comments:
Post a Comment