Sunday 20 October 2019

What's better to use in PHP $array[] = $value or array_push($array, $value)?



What's better to use in PHP for appending an array member:




$array[] = $value;


or



array_push($array, $value);


Though the manual says you're better off to avoid a function call, I've also read $array[] is much slower than array_push(). Does anyone have any clarifications or benchmarks?


Answer




No benchmarks, but I personally feel like $array[] is cleaner to look at, and honestly splitting hairs over milliseconds is pretty irrelevant unless you plan on appending hundreds of thousands of strings to your array.



Edit: Ran this code:



$t = microtime(true);
$array = array();
for($i = 0; $i < 10000; $i++) {
$array[] = $i;
}
print microtime(true) - $t;

print '
';
$t = microtime(true);
$array = array();
for($i = 0; $i < 10000; $i++) {
array_push($array, $i);
}
print microtime(true) - $t;


The first method using $array[] is almost 50% faster than the second one.




Some benchmark results:



Run 1
0.0054171085357666 // array_push
0.0028800964355469 // array[]

Run 2
0.0054559707641602 // array_push
0.002892017364502 // array[]


Run 3
0.0055501461029053 // array_push
0.0028610229492188 // array[]


This shouldn't be surprising, as the PHP manual notes this:




If you use array_push() to add one element to the array it's better to use $array[] = because in that way there is no overhead of calling a function.





The way it is phrased I wouldn't be surprised if array_push is more efficient when adding multiple values. EDIT: Out of curiosity, did some further testing, and even for a large amount of additions, individual $array[] calls are faster than one big array_push. Interesting.


No comments:

Post a Comment

php - file_get_contents shows unexpected output while reading a file

I want to output an inline jpg image as a base64 encoded string, however when I do this : $contents = file_get_contents($filename); print &q...