Tuesday 11 December 2018

Storing C++ template function definitions in a .CPP file



I have some template code that I would prefer to have stored in a CPP file instead of inline in the header. I know this can be done as long as you know which template types will be used. For example:



.h file




class foo
{
public:
template
void do(const T& t);
};


.cpp file




template 
void foo::do(const T& t)
{
// Do something with t
}

template void foo::do(const int&);
template void foo::do(const std::string&);



Note the last two lines - the foo::do template function is only used with ints and std::strings, so those definitions mean the app will link.



My question is - is this a nasty hack or will this work with other compilers/linkers? I am only using this code with VS2008 at the moment but will be wanting to port to other environments.


Answer



The problem you describe can be solved by defining the template in the header, or via the approach you describe above.



I recommend reading the following points from the C++ FAQ Lite:






They go into a lot of detail about these (and other) template issues.


No comments:

Post a Comment

php - file_get_contents shows unexpected output while reading a file

I want to output an inline jpg image as a base64 encoded string, however when I do this : $contents = file_get_contents($filename); print &q...